{"id":6133,"date":"2022-08-25T17:50:10","date_gmt":"2022-08-25T15:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tst.minijets.org\/?page_id=6133"},"modified":"2022-10-24T21:48:08","modified_gmt":"2022-10-24T19:48:08","slug":"mcdonnell-xfd-1-phantom-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/300-500\/westinghouse-19b\/mcdonnell-xfd-1-phantom-1\/","title":{"rendered":"McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"McDonnell
McDonnell FH-1, Phantom 1. Source : Collection Philippe Bezard<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

By the beginning of 1943 Westinghouse had made considerable progress with, the engine side of things, and the next job was to design an efficient airframe. \u00a0The US Navy’s Bureau of Aeronautics decided to call on the services of the\u00a0McDonnell Aircraft Corporation<\/strong>, the resultant joint effort to be designated\u00a0McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"McDonnell
The first prototype of the McDonnell Phantom during deck-landing trials aboard U.S.S. Franklin D. Roosevelt. Source : Flight Archives<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

The designers set out to produce the smallest possible fighter that would satisfactorily carry a pilot, four 0.50-inch guns and their ammunition for a specified length of time. Weight, wing area and even engine power were treated as secondary consideration. Everything was to be kept as simple as possible with no “frills” or unnecessary gadgets to complicate production. Attractive but unorthodox ideas such as a tailless or tail-first layout (to keep the tail out of the way of the jet exhaust) or a prone position for the pilot were quickly put aside, as it was wisely considered that it was difficult.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"McDonnell
McDonnell FH-1, Phantom 1. Showing the thickening of the wing roots to house the intakes for the twin Westinghouse power units. Source : Flight 10 april 1947<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"McDonnell
McDonnell FH-1, Phantom 1. Tests showed that the jet tail pipes might nave been located even closer inboard without burning the fuselage sides. Source : Flight 10 april 1947<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

By January, 1945, the last drawings had been finished, the last airframe parts made and assembled. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, the whole machine was given a very smooth high-gloss finish and was ready for its first flight, but . . . only one engine was ready for installation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

McDonnells had such confidence in their XFD-1, however, that, after a few ground runs and taxying tests, they decided to make the first flight on just the one engine. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This test was completely successful on 26 January 1945<\/strong> and showed that, because its engines were so close inboard, the XFD-1 had an almost negligible yawing movement on one engine. A fact that could easily save pilot’s life if an engine got shot up in action or failed during take-off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"McDonnell<\/figure>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By the beginning of 1943 Westinghouse had made considerable progress with, the engine side of things, and the next job was to design an efficient airframe. \u00a0The US Navy’s Bureau of Aeronautics decided to call on the services of the\u00a0McDonnell Aircraft Corporation, the resultant joint effort to be designated\u00a0McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1. The designers set […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5700,"parent":5692,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"planes-000-100":[],"class_list":["post-6133","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-plane-300-500"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6133\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5692"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6133"},{"taxonomy":"planes-000-100","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/minijets.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/planes-000-100?post=6133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}