<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Plane 300-500 &#8211; Minijets</title>
	<atom:link href="https://minijets.org/en/category/plane-300-500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://minijets.org/en</link>
	<description>Le site des passionnés de l&#039;aviation légère à réaction</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 18:54:58 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	hourly	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Ambrosini P.18</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/turbomeca-marbore/projets-marborej69/ambrosini-p-18/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 18:43:15 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">https://minijets.org/?page_id=8284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>L&#8217;Ambrosini P.18 est un projet d&#8217;avion biplace d&#8217;entrainement côte à côte &#8220;ab initio&#8221; étudié par Ermenegildo Preti pour le compte d&#8217;Ambrosini en 1955. Il devait être équipé d&#8217;un réacteur Turbomeca Marbore II, alimenté par une entrée d&#8217;air frontale, avec une éjection arrière située sous le fuselage en arrière du bord de fuite de l&#8217;aile. L&#8217;aile [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/turbomeca-marbore/projets-marborej69/ambrosini-p-18/">Ambrosini P.18</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="657" height="367" src="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ambrisini-P18.webp" alt="" class="wp-image-8285" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ambrisini-P18.webp 657w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ambrisini-P18-18x10.webp 18w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ambrisini-P18-300x168.webp 300w" sizes="(max-width: 657px) 100vw, 657px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Projet Ambrosini P.18 d&#8217;un biplace côte à côte à réaction. Source : Jane&#8217;s ATWA 1956-1957</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">L&#8217;Ambrosini P.18 est un projet d&#8217;avion biplace d&#8217;entrainement côte à côte &#8220;<em>ab initio</em>&#8221; étudié par Ermenegildo Preti pour le compte d&#8217;<a href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAI_Ambrosini#" data-type="URL" data-id="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAI_Ambrosini#" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ambrosini</a> en 1955. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Il devait être équipé d&#8217;un réacteur <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/turbomeca-marbore/" data-type="page" data-id="3923">Turbomeca Marbore II</a>, alimenté par une entrée d&#8217;air frontale, avec une éjection arrière située sous le fuselage en arrière du bord de fuite de l&#8217;aile.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">L&#8217;aile était médiane cantilever d&#8217;un allongement de 7. La construction était entièrement métallique. Le train d&#8217;atterrissage tricycle était rétractable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> </p>
</div>
</div><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/turbomeca-marbore/projets-marborej69/ambrosini-p-18/">Ambrosini P.18</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Northrop XP-79B</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/westinghouse-19b/northrop-xp-79b/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 18:45:31 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A l&#8217;origine, le&#160;Northrop XP-79&#160;répondait à &#160;un contrat passé par l&#8217;Army Air Force, portant sur 3 exemplaires d&#8217;un intercepteur propulsé par un moteur fusée d&#8217;une puissance d&#8217;environ 900 kg (2000 lbs). Ce moteur était &#160;en cours de développement chez&#160;Aerojet Corporation. Les performances calculées, avec 2 fusées JATO pour l&#8217;aide au décollage, devaient permettre à &#160;l&#8217;appareil d&#8217;atteindre [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/westinghouse-19b/northrop-xp-79b/">Northrop XP-79B</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="500" height="360" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_01.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5706" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_01.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_01-300x216.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_01-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Northrop XP-79B vue de coté. (photo U.S. Air Force)</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A l&#8217;origine, le&nbsp;<strong>Northrop XP-79</strong>&nbsp;répondait à &nbsp;un contrat passé par l&#8217;Army Air Force, portant sur 3 exemplaires d&#8217;un intercepteur propulsé par un moteur fusée d&#8217;une puissance d&#8217;environ 900 kg (2000 lbs). Ce moteur était &nbsp;en cours de développement chez&nbsp;<strong>Aerojet Corporation</strong>. Les performances calculées, avec 2 fusées JATO pour l&#8217;aide au décollage, devaient permettre à &nbsp;l&#8217;appareil d&#8217;atteindre 518 mph à &nbsp;40.000 pieds avec une endurance de 31 minutes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rapidement la mise au point du moteur fusée par Aerojet s&#8217;avéra problématique. Dans le même temps, les tous premiers turboréacteurs étaient disponibles, ce qui eu pour conséquence un arrêt du contrat pour les 2 premiers exemplaires et une demande faite pour la transformation du 3ième en intercepteur doté de 2 turboréacteurs <strong>Westinghouse 19B</strong> avec la nouvelle dénomination <strong>XP-79B</strong>.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Il sera livré à &nbsp;la base de Muroc en juin 1945, pour commencer les tests avec&nbsp;<strong>Harry Crosby</strong>&nbsp;comme pilote d&#8217;essai. Le&nbsp;<strong>12 septembre 1945</strong>, après plusieurs jours de tests et roulages préliminaires Crosby lui fit faire son seul et unique vol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Un premier incident malencontreux marqua le début du vol, lorsqu&#8217;un camion de pompier de l&#8217;Army Air Force traversa le piste au moment où Crosby accélérait.&nbsp;Crosby eu juste le temps de couper la puissance pour éviter la collision. Puis il ré-accéléra et monta jusqu&#8217;à &nbsp;10.000 pieds et revint vers son aire de décollage en décrivant un large cercle à &nbsp;une vitesse particulièrement élevée (évaluée à &nbsp;plus de 400 mph).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A son second passage au dessus du lac salé, Crosby amorça un virage en montée qui se termina en tonneau avant que l&#8217;avion ne décroche. Le XP-79B rentra alors dans une vrille dont il ne se sortit jamais. Des observateurs on vu Crosby sauter dans les derniers instant et être heurté par une partie de l&#8217;avion en rotation. Son parachute ne s&#8217;ouvrit jamais.</p>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="500" height="314" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_02.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5707" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_02.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_02-300x188.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_02-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Northrop XP-79B 3/4 side view. (U.S. Air Force photo)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="246" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_04.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5709" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_04.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_04-300x148.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_04-18x9.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></figure>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="220" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_03.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5708" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_03.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_03-300x132.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_03-18x8.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="236" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_013.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5711" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_013.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_013-300x142.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_013-18x8.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption><em>Northrop XP-79 Flying Ram, +500 mph. experimental fighter powered by two Westinghouse 19-B Yankee turbojets. Source : Aviation Week, June 1946</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="950" height="747" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_P3view.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-5705" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_P3view.jpg 950w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_P3view-300x236.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_P3view-768x604.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Northrop_XP79_P3view-15x12.jpg 15w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 950px) 100vw, 950px" /><figcaption>Northrop XP-79, P3 views</figcaption></figure><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/westinghouse-19b/northrop-xp-79b/">Northrop XP-79B</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/westinghouse-19b/mcdonnell-xfd-1-phantom-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:50:10 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By the beginning of 1943 Westinghouse had made considerable progress with, the engine side of things, and the next job was to design an efficient airframe.  The US Navy&#8217;s Bureau of Aeronautics decided to call on the services of the McDonnell Aircraft Corporation, the resultant joint effort to be designated McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1. The designers set [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/westinghouse-19b/mcdonnell-xfd-1-phantom-1/">McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="950" height="281" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_top.jpg" alt="McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1" class="wp-image-5704" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_top.jpg 950w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_top-300x89.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_top-768x227.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_top-18x5.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 950px) 100vw, 950px" /><figcaption>McDonnell FH-1, Phantom 1. Source : Collection Philippe Bezard</figcaption></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the beginning of 1943 Westinghouse had made considerable progress with, the engine side of things, and the next job was to design an efficient airframe.  The US Navy&#8217;s Bureau of Aeronautics decided to call on the services of the <strong>McDonnell Aircraft Corporation</strong>, the resultant joint effort to be designated <strong>McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1</strong>.</p>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="226" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_01.jpg" alt="McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1" class="wp-image-5699" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_01.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_01-300x136.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_01-18x8.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>The first prototype of the McDonnell Phantom during deck-landing trials aboard U.S.S. Franklin D. Roosevelt. Source : Flight Archives</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The designers set out to produce the smallest possible fighter that would satisfactorily carry a pilot, four 0.50-inch guns and their ammunition for a specified length of time. Weight, wing area and even engine power were treated as secondary consideration. Everything was to be kept as simple as possible with no &#8220;frills&#8221; or unnecessary gadgets to complicate production. Attractive but unorthodox ideas such as a tailless or tail-first layout (to keep the tail out of the way of the jet exhaust) or a prone position for the pilot were quickly put aside, as it was wisely considered that it was difficult.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="378" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_02.jpg" alt="McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1" class="wp-image-5700" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_02.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_02-300x227.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_02-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>McDonnell FH-1, Phantom 1. Showing the thickening of the wing roots to house the intakes for the twin Westinghouse power units. Source : Flight 10 april 1947</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="378" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_03.jpg" alt="McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1" class="wp-image-5701" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_03.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_03-300x227.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_03-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>McDonnell FH-1, Phantom 1. Tests showed that the jet tail pipes might nave been located even closer inboard without burning the fuselage sides. Source : Flight 10 april 1947</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By January, 1945, the last drawings had been finished, the last airframe parts made and assembled.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, the whole machine was given a very smooth high-gloss finish and was ready for its first flight, but . . . only one engine was ready for installation.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">McDonnells had such confidence in their XFD-1, however, that, after a few ground runs and taxying tests, they decided to make the first flight on just the one engine.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This test was completely successful on&nbsp;<strong>26 January 1945</strong>&nbsp;and showed that, because its engines were so close inboard, the XFD-1 had an almost negligible yawing movement on one engine. A fact that could easily save pilot&#8217;s life if an engine got shot up in action or failed during take-off.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="950" height="606" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/McDonnell_FH-1_Phantom_1_P3views.gif" alt="McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1" class="wp-image-5703"/></figure><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/westinghouse-19b/mcdonnell-xfd-1-phantom-1/">McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom 1</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ensign Aircraft EA-12</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-ensign-aircraft-ea-12/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:12:33 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ensign Aircraft EA·12 trainer design was one of five competitors in the US Air Force nextation trainer (NGT), to replace US Air Force T-37 basic trainers, bidding.  Ensign Aircraft Co, from Lakewood CA, was the smallest company to submit a proposal for the Air Force requirement and is competing against designs submitted by Rock·well International, Cessna, Fairchild [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-ensign-aircraft-ea-12/">Ensign Aircraft EA-12</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="679" height="368" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Ensign_Aircraft_EA-12.jpg" alt="Ensign Aircraft EA·12" class="wp-image-5729" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Ensign_Aircraft_EA-12.jpg 679w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Ensign_Aircraft_EA-12-300x163.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Ensign_Aircraft_EA-12-18x10.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 679px) 100vw, 679px" /><figcaption>Artist view of the Ensign Aircraft EA-12. Source : Aviation Week &amp; Space Technology, January 25, 1982.</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ensign Aircraft EA·12 </strong>trainer design was one of five competitors in the US Air Force nextation trainer (NGT), to replace US Air Force <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/continental-j69/cessna-t37/" data-type="page" data-id="4841">T-37</a> basic trainers, bidding. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ensign Aircraft Co, from Lakewood CA, was the smallest company to submit a proposal for the Air Force requirement and is competing against designs submitted by Rock·well International, Cessna, Fairchild and GulfStream American. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">EA-12, was a conventional design powered by a pair of <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/" data-type="page" data-id="6039">Williams Research WR44</a> turbofans, but which should be built largely by robots, keeping initial production costs to a minimum.</p>
</div>
</div><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-ensign-aircraft-ea-12/">Ensign Aircraft EA-12</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rockwell Nova NT1</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-rockwell-nova-nt-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:37:31 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Rockwell Nova NT1 was one of five competitors in the US Air Force New Generation Trainer (NGT): The NGT program provided a number of options, including: extend the life of the T-37s, possibly including modifications such as turbofan engines and modern&#160;avionics design and build a new aircraft built to USAF requirements —not an unlikely choice [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-rockwell-nova-nt-1/">Rockwell Nova NT1</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Rockwell Nova NT1 was one of five competitors in the US Air Force N<strong>ew Generation Trainer</strong> (NGT):</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="900" height="251" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nova-top.png" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1" class="wp-image-6111" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nova-top.png 900w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nova-top-300x84.png 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nova-top-768x214.png 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nova-top-18x5.png 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The NGT program provided a number of options, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>extend the life of the T-37s, possibly including modifications such as turbofan engines and modern&nbsp;avionics</li><li>design and build a new aircraft built to USAF requirements —not an unlikely choice when the 600-&nbsp;aircraft requirement is considered;</li><li>buy an existing offshore trainer.</li></ul>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="281" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-01.jpg" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1" class="wp-image-5742" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-01.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-01-300x169.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-01-18x10.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Maquette du Rockwell Nova NT1</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ROCKWELL was proposing a twinturbofan primary trainer to meet the US Air Force requirement for a <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/continental-j69/cessna-t37/" data-type="page" data-id="4841">Cessna T-37</a> replacement. The <strong>september 2nd 1980</strong> ROCKWELL unveils the <strong>Nova NT-1.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Among the competing&nbsp;<strong>NGT</strong>&nbsp;designs are a re-engined Cessna T-37 powered by fuel-efficient turbofans, a development of the RFB Fantrainer with side-by-side seating and twin ducted fans, and the all-new Rockwell Nova (<strong>Near-Term Optimum Value Aircraft</strong>).</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="603" height="452" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-06.jpg" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1" class="wp-image-6103" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-06.jpg 603w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-06-300x225.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-06-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 603px) 100vw, 603px" /></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Designated the<strong> Nova NT-1</strong>, the trainer has sideby-side seating and was powered by two <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/" data-type="page" data-id="6039">Williams Research WR-44</a> 1,000 lb-thrust-class medium-bypass turbofans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Slightly smaller than the T-37, the Nova has a Supercritical airfoil wing .</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cockpit is pressurised, giving a ceiling of 40,000ft compared to 25,000ft for the unpressurised T-37.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engines were mounted Fouga 90-style on each side of the fuselage above and behind the wing. Intakes extend forward over the wing leading edge.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="135" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-05.png" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1" class="wp-image-6107" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-05.png 400w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-05-300x101.png 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-05-18x6.png 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><figcaption>Nova NT-1 &#8211; Aviation week</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rockwell estimated that a first flight could take place in mid-1983 if the US Air Force selects a contractor and begins development late this year as planned. Production could begin in 1985 with first deliveries late that year. The potential USAF requirement is 600 aircraft. The T-37s will reach their 15,000hr life in the late 1980s.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="263" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-03.png" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1, P3 views" class="wp-image-6105" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-03.png 400w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-03-300x197.png 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-03-18x12.png 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><figcaption>Nova NT-1 Final design &#8211; Aviation week</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deficiencies identified in the existing trainer include lack of pressurisation which restricts altitude andand hence range and often prevents the aircraft from skirting bad weather. The high&nbsp;fuel consumption penalises range and endurance, preventing the aircraft&nbsp;from operating in weather which may call for a diversion. Both these factors&nbsp;result in decreased efficiency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other complaints are high noise levels, out-of-date instrumentation and difficult maintenance.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="135" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-04.png" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1" class="wp-image-6106" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-04.png 400w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-04-300x101.png 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-04-18x6.png 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><figcaption>Nova NT-1 &#8211; Aviation week</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="263" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-02.png" alt="Rockwell Nova NT1 mockup" class="wp-image-6104" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-02.png 400w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-02-300x197.png 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Rockwell_Nova-T1-02-18x12.png 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><figcaption>Nova NT-1 &#8211; Aviation week</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-rockwell-nova-nt-1/">Rockwell Nova NT1</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foxjet 3</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:58:50 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lors de la convention de la NBAA de 1977, Tony Fox, CEO de la compagnie Foxjet International, dévoilait, sous forme d&#8217;une maquette, son modèle Foxjet 3, triréacteur directement dérivé du biréacteur Foxjet ST600. L&#8217;appareil était proposé au prix d&#8217;environ 750 000 dollars contre 500 000 dollars pour le biréacteur. Le nouvel appareil devait voler à &#160;plus de 800 km-h [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-3/">Foxjet 3</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lors de la convention de la NBAA de 1977, <strong>Tony Fox</strong>, CEO de la compagnie Foxjet International,<strong> </strong>dévoilait, sous forme d&#8217;une maquette, son modèle <strong>Foxjet 3</strong>, <strong>triréacteur </strong>directement dérivé du biréacteur <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-st600/" data-type="page" data-id="6042">Foxjet ST600</a>. L&#8217;appareil était proposé au prix d&#8217;environ 750 000 dollars contre 500 000 dollars pour le biréacteur.</p>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="259" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_01.jpg" alt="Foxjet 3" class="wp-image-5733" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_01.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_01-300x155.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_01-18x9.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Maquette du Foxjet 3, présentée à la NBAA de 1977. Source : Aviation Magazine octobre 1977</em></figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="448" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_02.jpg" alt="Foxjet 3" class="wp-image-5730" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_02.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_02-300x269.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_02-13x12.jpg 13w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Maquette du Foxjet 3. Source : Aviation week, octobre 1977</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Le nouvel appareil devait voler à &nbsp;plus de 800 km-h en croisière et se poser à &nbsp;140 km-h. La masse à &nbsp;vide était estimée à &nbsp;1 134 kg pour une masse totale de 2 040 kg.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Les modifications dictées par rapport au biréacteur impliquaient une nouvelle position de l&#8217;aile (centrage) et, bien sûr, une nouvelle structure de la dérive qui voit passer, dans son emplanture, la manche d&#8217;alimentation du troisième réacteur.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Comme le biréacteur, le nouvel appareil devait emporter un pilote et quatre passagers avec peu de bagages, ou trois passagers sans limitation de bagages.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Les arguments ayant dicté la définition du triréacteur étaient, selon son constructeur, le fait que les vols d&#8217;affaires les plus courants comportent l&#8217;emport de 2, 3 personnes en moyenne annuelle, et ce sur des distances n&#8217;excédant pas 800 ou 1 100 km. C&#8217;est pourquoi l&#8217;autonomie du « Foxjet 3 » avaient été figée autour de 1 600 km au maximum.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Les trois réacteurs devaient être, bien sûr, les mêmes que ceux employés sur le biréacteur, à &nbsp;savoir des <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/" data-type="page" data-id="6039">Williams WR44</a> d&#8217;une poussée de 272 kgp, à &nbsp;double flux, pesant 64 kg.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ce projet comme le précédent a été abandonné.</p>
</div>
</div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Plans 3 vues du Foxjet 3</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="950" height="446" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views.jpg" alt="Foxjet 3, P3 views" class="wp-image-5732" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views.jpg 950w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views-300x141.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views-768x361.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views-18x8.jpg 18w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views-520x245.jpg 520w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 950px) 100vw, 950px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Plan 3 vues du Foxjet 3</em></figcaption></figure><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-3/">Foxjet 3</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foxjet ST-600</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-st600/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 07:59:40 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>En 1977, pour 350 000 dollars en version standard, prix pouvant atteindre 550 000 dollars avec quelques équipements supplémentaires, on devait pouvoir s&#8217;offrir un biréacteur d&#8217;affaires Foxjet ST-600 pour 4 à  5 occupants. C&#8217;est ce qu&#8217;annonçait Tony Fox, président de TONY TEAM INDUSTRIES (TTI), à  propos de son « Foxjet » ST-600 doté de deux Williams WR44 (initialement [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-st600/">Foxjet ST-600</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">En 1977, pour 350 000 dollars en version standard, prix pouvant atteindre 550 000 dollars avec quelques équipements supplémentaires, on devait pouvoir s&#8217;offrir un biréacteur d&#8217;affaires Foxjet ST-600 pour 4 à  5 occupants. C&#8217;est ce qu&#8217;annonçait <strong>Tony Fox</strong>, président de TONY TEAM INDUSTRIES (TTI), à  propos de son « Foxjet » ST-600 doté de deux <strong><a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/" data-type="page" data-id="6039">Williams WR44</a></strong> (initialement prévu avec des WR19-3 détarés à  258 kgp).</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="950" height="283" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_07.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-5736" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_07.jpg 950w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_07-300x89.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_07-768x229.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_07-18x5.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 950px) 100vw, 950px" /><figcaption>Présentation du Foxjet ST-600 (maquette à l&#8217;échelle 1). source : Aviation Week, juin 1978.</figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="300" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_05.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-5734" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_05.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_05-300x180.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_05-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Foxjet ST-600, première maquette à l&#8217;échelle 1. On remarquera la présence d&#8217;hublots rectangulaires et l&#8217;absence de bidons en bouts d&#8217;ailes. Source : Aviation week, mai 1977</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">En&nbsp;<strong>1977</strong>, Le ST600, avec son&nbsp;aile basse, son empennage cruciforme, et ses moteurs montés pod sur la partie arrière du fuselage,&nbsp;est un projet de VLJ avant l&#8217;heure</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Les intentions de Tony Fox étaient de créer un jet d&#8217;affaires pratique, assez petit et assez léger pour profiter de petits aérodromes à un coût d&#8217;environ la moitié du prix des jets d&#8217;affaires les moins chers de l&#8217;époque.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A titre d&#8217;exemple, les coûts de carburant avaient été calculé à &nbsp;9 cents par mile (à comparer à 50 cents par mile ou plus pour avions de l&#8217;époque). &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="282" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_03.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-5740" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_03.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_03-300x169.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_03-18x10.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption><em>Première maquette à l&#8217;échelle 1 du Foxjet St-600</em></figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="180" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_04.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-5741" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_04.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_04-300x108.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_04-18x6.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Maquette à l&#8217;échelle 1 du Foxjet ST-600, dans une version pré-production.</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">73 commandes de l&#8217;appareil ont été prises, sur la base du seul projet. Le premier exemplaire par&nbsp;<strong>Bill Lear&nbsp;</strong>lui même !&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Foxjet avait contracté&nbsp;<strong>Aeronca</strong>&nbsp;pour construire le prototype., et une exclusivité avec <strong>Williams</strong> pour la fourniture du moteur.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cependant, la non disponibilité des moteurs s&#8217;est avérée un obstacle majeur.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Le petit&nbsp;<strong>Williams WR44</strong>&nbsp;turboréacteur à &nbsp;double flux Williams Research devait être certifier pour une utilisation comme moteur de transport de passagers,&nbsp; mais en raison de sa sélection comme groupe motopropulseur pour les missiles de croisière, le gouvernement des Etats-Unis en bloqua toute utilisation non-militaire.&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views_v1.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-6121" width="496" height="295" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views_v1.jpg 1000w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views_v1-300x179.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views_v1-768x457.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FoxJet_3_-_P3views_v1-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 496px) 100vw, 496px" /><figcaption>Plan 3 vue du Foxjet ST-600, dans sa première version</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1000" height="595" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_P3view_v2-1.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-6125" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_P3view_v2-1.jpg 1000w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_P3view_v2-1-300x179.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_P3view_v2-1-768x457.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_P3view_v2-1-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /><figcaption><em>Plan 3 vue du Foxjet ST-600, dans sa dernière version</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="201" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_02.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-5739" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_02.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_02-300x121.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_02-18x7.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Maquette à l&#8217;échelle 1 du Foxjet ST-600</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="185" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_01.jpg" alt="Foxjet ST-600" class="wp-image-5738" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_01.jpg 500w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_01-300x111.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Foxjet_ST600_-_01-18x7.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption>Maquette à l&#8217;échelle 1 de l&#8217;avion d&#8217;affaires FoxJey ST-600. Source Aviation Magazine 1977</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-wr44/projet-foxjet-st600/">Foxjet ST-600</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BD-5J GE T-58</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/general-electric-t-58/bd5j/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 16:07:13 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ce BD-5J a été obtenu par montage d&#8217;un réacteur issu d&#8217;une transformation d&#8217;un GE T-58. Il est la propriété de Douglas Medore, de Romoland en Californie. Nous ne possédons que peut d&#8217;information sur cet appareil. Il semblerait qu&#8217;il ait été construit par Geoff Taylor. Il s&#8217;agit du projet de Rusty Skinner, constructeur d&#8217;un Viperjet, dont [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/general-electric-t-58/bd5j/">BD-5J GE T-58</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="800" height="450" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BD-5J_GE_T58_01.jpg" alt="BD-5J GE T-58" class="wp-image-3610" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BD-5J_GE_T58_01.jpg 800w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BD-5J_GE_T58_01-300x169.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BD-5J_GE_T58_01-768x432.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BD-5J_GE_T58_01-18x10.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ce BD-5J a été obtenu par montage d&#8217;un réacteur issu d&#8217;une transformation d&#8217;un GE T-58. Il est la propriété de Douglas Medore, de Romoland en Californie.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nous ne possédons que peut d&#8217;information sur cet appareil. Il semblerait qu&#8217;il ait été construit par Geoff Taylor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Il s&#8217;agit du projet de Rusty Skinner, constructeur d&#8217;un Viperjet, dont le Lt commander Doug &#8220;Bones&#8221; Medore a fait le premier vol le 30 mai 2013. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Une photo de cet appareil avait été publiée dans le magazine Kitplanes du 18 septembre 2015</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="960" height="654" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_02.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6023" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_02.jpg 960w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_02-300x204.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_02-768x523.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_02-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="960" height="640" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_04.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6020" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_04.jpg 960w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_04-300x200.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_04-768x512.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_04-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="960" height="540" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_05.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6021" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_05.jpg 960w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_05-300x169.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_05-768x432.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_05-18x10.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="900" height="603" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_06.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6028" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_06.jpg 900w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_06-300x201.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_06-768x515.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/BD-5J_GE_T58_06-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /><figcaption>Projet de BD-5J, équipé d&#8217;un GE T-58, de Rusty Skinner. Photo prise à Chino Airport en septembre 2015. Source : Kitplanes</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/general-electric-t-58/bd5j/">BD-5J GE T-58</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>JetEZ</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/general-electric-t-58/jetez/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 12:31:45 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=6010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Le&#160;JetEZ, est un appareil propulsé par un turboréacteur&#160;GE T58-8F. Il a été conçu par&#160;Lance Hooley, de Kissimmee en Floride. La réalisation est en partie due à&#160;Robert Harris, déjà connu pour le Cozy Jet N722. Le projet JetEZ à commencé en 2004. Bien qu&#8217;il ressemble à un Long-EZ,&#160;le JetEZ&#160;est 10 cm plus large,&#160;15 cm plus long [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/general-electric-t-58/jetez/">JetEZ</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The&nbsp;<strong>JetEZ</strong>, est un appareil propulsé par un turboréacteur&nbsp;<strong>GE T58-8F</strong>. Il a été conçu par&nbsp;<strong>Lance Hooley</strong>, de Kissimmee en Floride. La réalisation est en partie due à&nbsp;<strong>Robert Harris</strong>, déjà connu pour le Cozy Jet N722.</p>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_01-1024x683.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-3575" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_01-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_01-300x200.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_01-768x512.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_01-18x12.jpg 18w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_01.jpg 1080w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption><em>JetEZ N815EY (NOISEY). Source : Kiplanes.com</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Le projet JetEZ à commencé en 2004. Bien qu&#8217;il ressemble à un Long-EZ,&nbsp;le JetEZ&nbsp;est 10 cm plus large,&nbsp;15 cm plus long (sur la partie en arrière des sièges pilotes), et 30 cm plus haut.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Robert a conçu la structure interne.&nbsp;L&#8217;appareil a des ailes de Racer et une section centrale avec un longeron fortement modifié. Le plan canard a également été adapté, pour tenir compte des forces induites&nbsp;accrues du fait&nbsp;des vitesses&nbsp;de vol&nbsp;plus élevées.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1000" height="750" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_02.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-3603" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_02.jpg 1000w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_02-300x225.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_02-768x576.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_02-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /><figcaption>Jet Eze at Sun N Fun 2018. Source : video Jet guys</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1000" height="750" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_03.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-3573" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_03.jpg 1000w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_03-300x225.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_03-768x576.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/JetEZ_03-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /><figcaption>Air venture 2018.Source : EAA.org</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Canard Jet fly by" width="1380" height="776" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sIZcsbRHSnY?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Le premier vol a eu lieu&nbsp;le&nbsp;<strong>27 février 2017</strong>, avec Ryzard Zadow aux commandes. Le JetEz avait 50 heures lorsqu&#8217;il a été présenté à l&#8217;AirVenture 2017.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Caractéristiques connues du JetEZ</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Vitesse maximum&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>310</td><td>nœuds</td></tr><tr><td>Service ceiling</td><td>&nbsp; 18 000</td><td>pieds</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Malheureusement, Lance Hooley est décédé Le 1er septembre 2018, dans le crash de son JETEZ, N815EY, près de l&#8217;aéroport municipal de Covington, dans le Tennessee. Les rapports initiaux indiquent que l&#8217;avion a subi une rupture en vol et a percuté le sol alors qu&#8217;il manœuvrait à basse altitude</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RIP Lance</p><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/general-electric-t-58/jetez/">JetEZ</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Williams V-Jet II</title>
		<link>https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-fjx-2/williams-v-jet-ii/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Bezard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:33:56 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Plane 300-500]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://tst.minijets.org/?page_id=5963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Built by Scaled Composites under contract to William, the Williams V-JET II made its first flight on April 13, 1997 NASA&#160;has hard partnered with the general aviation industry in introducing the V-JET II, a turbofan-powered light aircraft designed for future flight testing. It was expected to revolutionize and revitalize general aviation with a safer, smoother, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-fjx-2/williams-v-jet-ii/">Williams V-Jet II</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Built by Scaled Composites under contract to William, the Williams V-JET II made its first flight on April 13, 1997</p>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="370" height="274" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-02.jpg" alt="Williams V-Jet II" class="wp-image-5976" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-02.jpg 370w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-02-300x222.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-02-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 370px) 100vw, 370px" /><figcaption>With Courtesy of Scaled Composites, LLC</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NASA</strong>&nbsp;has hard partnered with the general aviation industry in introducing the V-JET II, a turbofan-powered light aircraft designed for future flight testing. It was expected to revolutionize and revitalize general aviation with a safer, smoother, quieter and more affordable light aircraft.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>NASA</strong>&nbsp;awarded&nbsp;<strong>Williams International&nbsp;</strong>a 37 million dollar developmental grant to design and build such a small jet engine.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="370" height="222" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-05.jpg" alt="Williams V-Jet II" class="wp-image-5968" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-05.jpg 370w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-05-300x180.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-05-18x12.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 370px) 100vw, 370px" /><figcaption>Image : Nasa &#8211; The V-Jet II, an all-composite, turbofan-powered light aircraft, was designed by Williams International of Walled Lake, Michigan</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Burt Rutan</strong> and his <strong>Scaled Composites</strong> had been contracted to built V-JET II (in reference to the earlier version Sam Williams had introduced in the mid-80). While the overall configuration had been created by Sam Williams, it was up to Burt and his staff to do the detail design work and then execute it in the new, patent-pending composite construction method Scaled Composites has developed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A the time of its first flight on<strong> April 13,1997</strong>, the VJET II was powered by two <strong>Williams International <a href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/william-fjx-1/" data-type="page" data-id="5948">FJX-1</a></strong> turbofan engines.</p>
</div>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-995f960e wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="370" height="273" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-03.jpg" alt="Williams V-Jet II" class="wp-image-5972" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-03.jpg 370w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-03-300x221.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-03-16x12.jpg 16w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 370px) 100vw, 370px" /><figcaption>With Courtesy of Scaled Composites, LLC</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="846" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06-1024x846.jpg" alt="Williams V-Jet II" class="wp-image-5969" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06-1024x846.jpg 1024w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06-300x248.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06-768x634.jpg 768w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06-1536x1269.jpg 1536w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06-15x12.jpg 15w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams_V-Jet_II_-_06.jpg 2000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption>Aviation Week</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="246" src="http://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-01.jpg" alt="Williams V-Jet II" class="wp-image-5970" srcset="https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-01.jpg 750w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-01-300x98.jpg 300w, https://minijets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Williams-V-Jet-II-01-18x6.jpg 18w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /></figure><p>L’article <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en/300-500/williams-fjx-2/williams-v-jet-ii/">Williams V-Jet II</a> est apparu en premier sur <a rel="nofollow" href="https://minijets.org/en">Minijets</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>